Question about "Five Common Misconceptions about Bias in..."

Practical and theoretical implementation discussion.
Post Reply
beason
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:58 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Question about "Five Common Misconceptions about Bias in..."

Post by beason » Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:45 pm

In http://cs.au.dk/~toshiya/misc.pdf

the author mentions the "geometry term" (in particular from a shadow ray) as example of variance being NOT finite and existing.

1) Is the geometry term "G" from Veach's thesis, namely: visibility*cos(theta1)*cos(theta2)/r^2?
2) Why would this be either not finite or existing? When r=0, or something else?

bouliiii
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:09 am

Re: Question about "Five Common Misconceptions about Bias in

Post by bouliiii » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:58 am

Yes this is the geometric term from Veach PhD.

As Toshiya said, you need to importance sample the geometric term i.e. 1/r^2 has to "go away" in the estimator. This is trivially the case in path tracing or less trivially, with multiple important sampling for bidirectional path tracing.

With Instant Radiosity non-clamped estimator, the geometric term indeed "causes" the unbounded variance (when r tends to 0). This is just the way the estimator is built.

Interestingly, you still have some convergence property with unbounded variance with the weak law of large numbers (convergence in probability) but as far as I know, this is useless for numerical purposes (exactly as Instant Radiosity is with no clamp) since you cannot rely anymore on the central limit theorem that provides the convergence rate.

Post Reply